link to Home Page

Alternate Explanation 3


How many Alternate Explanations have we had, over this past year?  

3. NEAT Chart Doctored to Include Jan 19, 2002 Object
     http://www.zetatalk.com/usenet/use90489.htm

    Date: Tue, 02 Apr 2002 14:21:14 -0600
    Article: <3CAA12BA.C9FD7D8F@zetatalk.com> 
    Subject: Planet X: The ALTERNATE EXPLANATION!

        .. then the NEAT images taken on Jan 19, 2002 
        shows odd contradictions, indications of a poorly done 
        doctoring job, and were unavailable from the NASA web 
        site for a month.  So WHY would they be bothering to 
        change the NEAT chart, when the object is moving and 
        they'd be chasing it, an unknown path, with the Zeta
        coordinates only being given out six weeks or so in the 
        future at a time?
            http://www.zetatalk.com/usenet/use90458.htm
            http://www.zetatalk.com/usenet/use90460.htm 
            http://www.zetatalk.com/usenet/use90487.htm

        Well, I got an urge to go in and check the Path diagram, 
        showing roughly where the Zetas have predicted Planet X 
        would be from now until March 3, 2003, and it HIT ME!  
        The point where Planet X is NOW, in it's path, is darn 
        close to where it will appear (per the Zeta prediction) on 
        March 3, 2003! Very little motion expected!  So, safe bet 
        to build in an "existing object" on the NEAT charts, claim
        it was there all along, and as it gets brighter come up with 
        some safe explaination like a brown dwarf FAR away 
        going poof (or whatever they do).  This should last for a
        YEAR, if they are lucky...