Planet X Coordinates, Clarified 1

Regarding questions being raised on whether the Zeta coordinates are
degrees or hours.  Questions on degrees or hours were asked or discussed
in July:

In Article <Pine.BSI.4.05L.10107141627370.26035-100000@shell.golden.net> John Latala wrote:
> On Sat, 14 Jul 2001, Nancy Lieder wrote:
>> I'll repeat the Zeta coordinates, to set this straight:
>>          RA 4.45732 Dec 11.91793 on Sep 30, 2001
>
> So is your RA degrees or hours?

And

In Article <%6147.1266$0s2.235876@typhoon.hawaii.rr.com> David Tholen wrote:
>> The article stated 2001 KX76 was:
>>     RA     16 16 06.12
>>     Dec   -19 13 45.6
>> and the Zeta coordinates for Planet X on July 3rd were
>>     RA      4.96112
>>     Dec    15.74311
>
> The point on the sky opposite the location of 2001
> KX76 is at RA 04 16 06.12 and DEC +19 13 45.6.
> That means your coordinates are less than 4 degrees
> further to the south.

And on July 15, 2001 in Article <3B51E1CA.E211973F@zetatalk.com> I
answered:

%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

In Article <%6147.1266$0s2.235876@typhoon.hawaii.rr.com> David Tholen wrote:
> It won't change the fact that you originally reported the
> right ascension difference in degrees, .. You treated
> YOUR OWN coordinates as if the right ascension was
> expressed in DEGREES.  That puts your coordinates in
> the Pisces-Pegasus border region, not Orion.

It puts them at RA 4, etc. whether I call them tomatoes or carrots.  It
puts them in the map at the
     Path as Viewed from Earth page
     (http://www.zetatalk.com/theword/tword03h.htm)
which I have forever been pointing to.  It puts them at the coordinates
by date on the
     Coordinates page
     (http://www.zetatalk.com/theword/tword03m.htm)
which I have forever been pointing to.  If I call Orion a star cluster
instead of a constellation, this does not change the position of Orion
on a skymap I’m pointing to.  It means I don’t understand what term to
use when referencing Orion.  Only someone attempting to confuse would
say so.

%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

And you know, as David Tholen indicated in discussing the issue above,
HE was not confused, nor was an amateur astronomer who commented about
the RA and Dec given by the Zetas in trying to come up with a “what it
could be” from known objects in the sky maps.  Even an amateur can see
that the coordinates given by the Zetas are decimal places after the RA
and Dec, without needing to ask.  From a posting dated June 9, 2001,
Article <3B2B5E54.E463CD8C@zetatalk.com>, related to the Lowel sighting
in April, 2001.

**************************************************

Subject: [tt-watch] My outing at Lowell Observatory
Date: Wed, 04 Apr 2001 03:06:45 -0000

    The next day, Monday April 2nd 2001, I emailed an
    acquaintance who is a very experienced amateur astronomer.
    I asked him how I might determine what the object that I
    saw was and I gave him the description and coordinates.
    Here is the relevant part of his reply:

        I have checked this position WITHIN SEVERAL
        DEGREES (my emphasis) and found no nebula,
        galaxy or planetary nebula. I did, however, find the
        following open clusters near your position:

            NGC1807 051042 +163200 ~20 stars,
                Mag: 7.0 diam:~16'/arc
            NGC1817 051206 +164200 ~60 stars,
                Mag: 7.7 diam:~17'/arc

*****************************************************

So those are decimal places, whatever the term for that might be.