| |
|
Article: <5ehr9d$m71@dfw-ixnews12.ix.netcom.com>
From: saquo@ix.netcom.com(Nancy )
Subject: Re: Orbital Elements for the 12th Planet
Date: 20 Feb 1997 15:40:29 GMT
In article <5eg1a2$f5f@nntp1.u.washington.edu> Lamong
Granquist writes:
>> If they pass and don't curve very much, hyperbolic, you
>> consider them a one-shot affair. The 12th Planet, due to
its
>> great mass and the consequent speed it attains for
passage,
>> has a different orbit shape!
>
> What you're proposing is throwing out the equivalence
principle.
> ... Even if it is reduced by orders of magnitude it would
still be
> measurable. It has never been measured. Therefore, you're
> wrong.
> lamontg@nospam.washington.edu
(Begin ZetaTalk[TM])
And what you're proposing is imposing the behavior of
non-traveling planets in your Solar System onto this traveling
planet, the 12th Planet. Fish can't live out of water therefore
the cat must be assumed to live in water. Ridiculous!
(End ZetaTalk[TM])