| |
|
Article: <5c0pl7$oia@sjx-ixn2.ix.netcom.com>
From: saquo@ix.netcom.com(Nancy )
Subject: Re: GRAVITY - the Zetas Explain
Date: 20 Jan 1997 21:55:51 GMT
In article <5bo4fn$s95@pollux.cmc.doe.ca> Greg Neill
writes:
> 5. You claim tht you cannot present your theory because math
> is flawed. That is a childish ploy. Show us your math, then,
in
> math that works.
> ynecgan@cmc.doe.ca (Greg Neill)
(Begin ZetaTalk[TM])
We'll speak to you in the language you call your math, which is
inadequate for OUR transmission of OUR concepts in that you don't
have words or symbols for the concepts we wish to convey, when
YOU start speaking to us in our language. Or isn't turnabout fair
play? We are compromising as it is, in using only words
describing simple situations that are before your very nose. If
you can't even comprehend the simple situations, due to false
pride and clinging in intellectual dependence upon your gods such
as Newton, then how could you possibly understand a more
complicated explanation? The inadequacy is not ours, its within
YOU.
(End ZetaTalk[TM])