| |
|
Article: <5ar387$f74@sjx-ixn5.ix.netcom.com>
From: saquo@ix.netcom.com(Nancy )
Subject: Re: CENTRIFUGAL FORCE - the Zetas Explain
Date: 6 Jan 1997 14:46:31 GMT
In article <32CC8CA2.2951@acs.tamu.edu> Eric Kline
writes:
> Your point that planets return to their pre-purtabation
orbit
> is wrong. Planets don't return to their pre-perturbation
orbit.
> Once perturbed, planets enter a new orbit. This new orbit is
> nearly identical to the old orbit because the perturbations
are
> very small.
> eric kline <emk9267@acs.tamu.edu>
In article <5ajo2m$r57@pollux.cmc.doe.ca> Greg Neill
writes:
>> (Begin ZetaTalk[TM])
>> Tut Tut! The publications discuss perturbations, NOT a
basic
>> change in the orbits, which are found in the same place,
and
>> expected TO BE in the same place, over the centuries.
They
>> are, in fact, considered to be a constant, proving our
point
>> nicely.
>> (End ZetaTalk[TM])
>
> The Almanac gives expressions for the position of the
planets
> based upon orbits integrated (mathematically) with the
significant
> perturbations included.
> ynecgan@cmc.doe.ca (Greg Neill)
In aritcle <32CD768A.2FA9@worldnet.att.net> Christopher
writes:
> Periodic perturbations cancelout over time and do not effect
> the stability of the orbit. However, Secular perturbations
will
> have a progressive effect and will cause the orbit to become
> unstable. This is a basic tenent of orbital mechanics.
> Christopher Scott <CJScott@worldnet.att.net>
In article <5ajbob$4u7@pollux.cmc.doe.ca> Greg Neill
writes:
> The influence of the orbiting planets on each other DO alter
> their orbits over time. It has been shown that the evolution
> of the planetary orbits actually constitute a chaotic system
> (chaotic in the mathematical sense). That the overall system
> is actually stable is not yet decided for certain, although
recent
> work with very long-running digital orreries seems to
indicate
> that it is.
> ynecgan@cmc.doe.ca (Greg Neill)
(Begin ZetaTalk[TM])
Your are ALL wrong, and we are right. This is not because our
emissary, Nancy, understands how orbits are determined, the
formulas, or has ever peeked into an Almanac to understand what
it contains. It is because we, the Service-to-Other Zetas who are
speaking to you here, listen extensively to what is in your
heads, telepathically, and understand how you THINK and what the
basis for your conclusions are.
Quite simply, the orbits are used as a CONSTANT upon which perturbations are considered to be a TEMPORARY displacement. The final point made above by Greg substantiates our point that not only do you THINK of these orbits are stable and a constant, you have verified that they ARE stable and a constant, given their current size and mass and the size and mass of the Sun.
This proves OUR point, that for the planets to return to their
pre-perturbation orbits after they have been perturbed, SOMETHING
must be causing this to happen. You, the humans, have zero
explanation for what this something might this. Nevertheless, you
consider our explanation wrong and fanciful. You discuss
space/time and the exact date of the birth of your Universe, and
THIS is not fanciful, but we are. Is this because Nancy is a
woman, or because we're not human. It certainly is not because
we're wrong and you're right!
(End ZetaTalk[TM])